ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
Care pathway in patients after myocardial infarction in Denmark - healthcare and drug utilization.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Highlights recently published in the International Journal of Cardiology Heart & Vasculature on sex differences in cardiovascular disease diagnosis and management.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Following myocardial infarction (MI), patients are recommended to lower their low-density lipid cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and undergo cardiac rehabilitation to prevent recurrent events. Although lowering LDL-C is vital post-MI, many patients fail reaching sufficient levels, resulting in recurrent cardiovascular events. The aim of the study was therefore to investigate the follow-up and the utilisation of lipid lowering therapy one year after MI. Methods: This register-based nationwide Danish observational study included all hospitalized patients with an incident MI from 2018 to 2021, discharged alive. Patients were followed for one year after discharge with respect to LDL-C measurements, contacts with different healthcare actors, and lipid lowering therapy. Results: A total of 24,977 patients were included. During follow-up, the incidence of having an LDL-C measured once and twice were 87 % and 67 %, respectively. The incidence of patients visiting a cardiology department, general practitioner with an LDL-C measurement, and having an acute hospital contact were 66 %, 70 %, and 48 %. Statin therapy was redeemed by most patients at least once (87 %) or twice (82 %), while ezetimibe (16 %) and other drugs were prescribed less frequently. Younger, higher educated, less comorbid males with LDL-C ≥ 1.4 mmol/L at hospitalization were more likely to be followed-up with LDL-C measurement or visit to a cardiology department post-MI. Conclusion: These findings show that a large proportion of patients are not receiving lipid lowering therapy or are not monitored according to guidelines one year after an MI. This suggests a further need for monitoring MI patients with LDL-C levels and healthcare visits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.