Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050745›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025

Care pathway in patients after myocardial infarction in Denmark - healthcare and drug utilization.

Marius Mølsted Flege, Theresa Kleinschmidt, Susanne Hansen, Kristoffer Jarlov Jensen, Henrik Kjærulf Jensen, Morten Krogh Christiansen, Charlotte Ottar Merland, Janne Petersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marius Mølsted FlegeCopenhagen Phase IV Unit (Phase4CPH), Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Theresa KleinschmidtCopenhagen Phase IV Unit (Phase4CPH), Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Susanne HansenCopenhagen Phase IV Unit (Phase4CPH), Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kristoffer Jarlov JensenCopenhagen Phase IV Unit (Phase4CPH), Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik Kjærulf JensenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Morten Krogh ChristiansenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Charlotte Ottar MerlandAmgen AB, Ballerup, Denmark.
Janne PetersenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Following myocardial infarction (MI), patients are recommended to lower their low-density lipid cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and undergo cardiac rehabilitation to prevent recurrent events. Although lowering LDL-C is vital post-MI, many patients fail reaching sufficient levels, resulting in recurrent cardiovascular events. The aim of the study was therefore to investigate the follow-up and the utilisation of lipid lowering therapy one year after MI. Methods: This register-based nationwide Danish observational study included all hospitalized patients with an incident MI from 2018 to 2021, discharged alive. Patients were followed for one year after discharge with respect to LDL-C measurements, contacts with different healthcare actors, and lipid lowering therapy. Results: A total of 24,977 patients were included. During follow-up, the incidence of having an LDL-C measured once and twice were 87 % and 67 %, respectively. The incidence of patients visiting a cardiology department, general practitioner with an LDL-C measurement, and having an acute hospital contact were 66 %, 70 %, and 48 %. Statin therapy was redeemed by most patients at least once (87 %) or twice (82 %), while ezetimibe (16 %) and other drugs were prescribed less frequently. Younger, higher educated, less comorbid males with LDL-C ≥ 1.4 mmol/L at hospitalization were more likely to be followed-up with LDL-C measurement or visit to a cardiology department post-MI. Conclusion: These findings show that a large proportion of patients are not receiving lipid lowering therapy or are not monitored according to guidelines one year after an MI. This suggests a further need for monitoring MI patients with LDL-C levels and healthcare visits.

Indexed as

LDL-cholesterolLipid lowering therapyMyocardial infarctionPharmacoepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID41050745
PMCPMC12495251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.