ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2025
Efficacy of Upadacitinib in the Treatment of Acquired Reactive Perforating Collagenosis in a Patient with Type 1 Diabetes: A Case Report and A Literature Review.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Upadacitinib in refractory acquired reactive perforating collagenosis with atopic dermatitis and chronic kidney disease: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acquired reactive perforating collagenosis (ARPC) is a rare skin condition characterized by collagen loss through the epidermis. We report the first clinical use of the JAK inhibitor upadacitinib for treating ARPC in a 32-year-old woman with a 17-year history of type 1 diabetes, whose persistent pruritic lesions responded poorly to conventional treatments. The patient started a daily regimen of 15 mg upadacitinib and showed a rapid response within 2 weeks, with significant lesion flattening and no new eruptions. By week 4, her pruritus was fully resolved. By week 16, she transitioned to an every-other-day dosing schedule without adverse effects. This article reviews existing literature on JAK inhibitors in ARPC treatment, indicating favorable outcomes. However, given the characteristics of ARPC, sustained maintenance therapy with JAK inhibitors may be necessary. We also explore the potential role of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of ARPC associated with different types of diabetes, suggesting that JAK inhibitors may offer new therapeutic options for diabetic patients with ARPC. The limitations of this article include a small sample size and a lack of cost-effectiveness analysis. Therefore, larger-scale studies are needed to validate the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of ARPC and to further investigate clinical differences among patients with various forms of diabetes complicated by ARPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.