ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: insights into relapse risk and future management directions.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inflammatory blood count ratios discriminate disease activity and remain persistently elevated during glucocorticoid-free remission in ANCA-associated vasculitis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Real-world outcomes of avacopan beyond the first year in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a retrospective cohort study.BMC rheumatology · 2026Article
- Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pills targeting Piezo1/CaChinese medicine · 2026Article
- Evolving Therapeutic Strategies in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: Current Standards and Emerging Targets for GPA and MPA.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- Prediction of relapses in patients with small vessel vasculitides: a multicenter cohort study on histopathological risk patterns.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) has a relapsing-remitting course and, even with the availability of effective maintenance therapies such as rituximab, relapse rates remain high. Relapse is associated with the accrual of organ damage stemming from both the underlying disease and from the effects of AAV treatments; thus, early detection and proactive prevention are crucial. AAV study populations typically include mixed cohorts of patients with new-onset and relapsing disease. Although data specifically addressing re-induction of remission after relapse are limited, available evidence suggests high remission rates when rituximab is combined with glucocorticoids. However, the balance between effective disease control and the potential treatment-related side effects must be carefully considered, and new therapeutic options may help improve this tradeoff. The aim of this review is to explore what is known about relapse risk and relapse management while considering emerging pathogenic and therapeutic paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.