ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Efficacy of Tislelizumab plus Lenvatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy: a real-world study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based Adjuvant Treatment Versus Surveillance in Curatively Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with anti-VEGF/TKIs and TACE in uHCC: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization versus lenvatinib plus tislelizumab in patients with BCLC stage 0 -B hepatocellular carcinoma after radical resection.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The efficacy of adjuvant therapy after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients is still debated. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of adjuvant Tislelizumab combined with Lenvatinib on the prognosis of patients with HCC after hepatectomy. Methods: Patients diagnosed with HCC and undergoing curative hepatectomy were retrospectively enrolled, and stratified into two groups: the Hepatectomy alone group and the Hepatectomy-T-L group, based on whether they received adjuvant therapy with Tislelizumab and Lenvatinib. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS); the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and adverse events. Results: A total of 288 patients were enrolled and assigned to the Hepatectomy alone group (n=256) and the Hepatectomy-T-L group (n=32) between January 2019 and December 2023. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The median follow-up time was 28.73 months (95% CI 26.03-31.43 months). The median DFS was significantly longer in the Hepatectomy-T-L group than in the Hepatectomy Alone group [40.78 months (95% CI 29.25-52.31) vs. 28.80 months (95% CI 25.52-32.08), hazard ratio [HR] = 0.51 (95% CI 0.28-0.91), P = 0.021]. The median OS was also significantly longer in the Hepatectomy-T-L group than in the Hepatectomy Alone group [42.10 months (95% CI 37.55-46.65) vs. 34.00 months (95% CI 30.40-37.60), HR = 0.36 (95% CI 0.18-0.70), P = 0.0018]. Adverse events were more frequently observed in the Hepatectomy-T-L group. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was compared and manageable between the two groups. Conclusions: Adjuvant Tislelizumab and Lenvatinib after curative hepatectomy holds significant potential benefits with manageable adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.