ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Controlled human malaria infection studies: insights into recent advances and key immunological and ethical implementation lessons.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Malaria vaccine protection against intradermal or venous parasites: a randomized phase 2b human challenge trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Malaria serology for surveillance, insights into immunity, and vaccine development.Infection and immunity · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Controlled human infection studies offer a unique opportunity to study the efficacy of novel interventions, mechanisms of infection and disease, as well as determine correlates of protection that may underpin the development of novel interventions. Controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) studies supported the clinical development of the first malaria vaccines (i.e. RTSS/AS01 and R21/Matrix-M). The CHMI model accurately predicted efficacy of these vaccines and accelerated their clinical development. In addition to vaccine development, over the last decade CHMI studies have supported the advancement of drugs, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and been instrumental in characterising immunity to malaria by unravelling immunological and innate mechanisms that may mediate protection. Here, we briefly review the history and rationale of the available falciparum malaria CHMI models. We highlight key applications and lessons learned from CHMI studies conducted in naïve and endemic populations with respect to immunological advances, discoveries in therapeutic targets such as mAbs, and transferring of the models from high income to low- and middle-income settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.