Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050675›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

Controlled human malaria infection studies: insights into recent advances and key immunological and ethical implementation lessons.

Rodney Ogwang, Mohamed Adan, Philip Bejon, Melissa C Kapulu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rodney OgwangBiosciences Department, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kenya Medical Research Institute-Welcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Mohamed AdanBiosciences Department, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kenya Medical Research Institute-Welcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Philip BejonBiosciences Department, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kenya Medical Research Institute-Welcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Melissa C KapuluBiosciences Department, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kenya Medical Research Institute-Welcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlled human infection studies offer a unique opportunity to study the efficacy of novel interventions, mechanisms of infection and disease, as well as determine correlates of protection that may underpin the development of novel interventions. Controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) studies supported the clinical development of the first malaria vaccines (i.e. RTSS/AS01 and R21/Matrix-M). The CHMI model accurately predicted efficacy of these vaccines and accelerated their clinical development. In addition to vaccine development, over the last decade CHMI studies have supported the advancement of drugs, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and been instrumental in characterising immunity to malaria by unravelling immunological and innate mechanisms that may mediate protection. Here, we briefly review the history and rationale of the available falciparum malaria CHMI models. We highlight key applications and lessons learned from CHMI studies conducted in naïve and endemic populations with respect to immunological advances, discoveries in therapeutic targets such as mAbs, and transferring of the models from high income to low- and middle-income settings.

Indexed as

MalariaMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesPlasmodium falciparumAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalHumansVaccine DevelopmentAntibodies, MonoclonalMalaria VaccinesAfricacorrelate of protectionhuman infection studiesimmunitymonoclonal antibodiesPlasmodium falciparumvaccines

Identifiers

PMID41050675
PMCPMC12488573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.