Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050673›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

CX

Sree Varshini Murali, Andrew R Stothert, Elyssa Pereyra, Lyudmila Batalkina, Tejbeer Kaur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Update of
    CX2025
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sree Varshini Murali *Department of Head & Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences and Brain Health Institute, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, United States.
Andrew R Stothert *Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
Elyssa Pereyra *Department of Biology, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
Lyudmila BatalkinaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
Tejbeer KaurDepartment of Head & Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences and Brain Health Institute, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, United States.

Funding

Innate Immunity to Spiral Ganglion Neuron DegenerationR01DC019918 · NIDCD · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Tejbeer Kaur · 2022 to 2026
$2.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cochlear injury activates the resident macrophages (RM) and recruits the blood-circulating monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages (Mo/Mo-M), but their specific functions in the injured cochlea are unknown. It is well-established that the chemokine fractalkine receptor (CX Methods: We used a fate mapping tamoxifen-inducible CX Results: After 60 days of tamoxifen injections at 4 weeks of age, long-lived cochlear RM were YFP+ RFP+ with 98.0% ± 1.7% recombinant efficiency, and short-lived blood-circulating CX Discussion: These data imply that macrophages in the noise-injured cochlea are heterogeneous regarding their ontogeny, distribution, and fate. They offer a robust tool to study the precise roles of resident and recruited macrophages in healthy and pathological ears.

Indexed as

CochleaCX3C Chemokine Receptor 1Hearing Loss, Noise-InducedMacrophagesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicSpiral GanglionTamoxifenCX3C Chemokine Receptor 1Cx3cr1 protein, mouseTamoxifencochleafate-mappingfractalkinemacrophagemonocytemonocyte-derived macrophagenoise-induced hearing lossspiral ganglion neurons

Identifiers

PMID41050673
PMCPMC12492497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.