ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Regulatory T cell therapy for xenotransplantation, what perspectives?
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond conventional immunosuppression: tailoring perioperative management protocols for clinical xenotransplantation.Clinical transplantation and research · 2026Review
- Beyond CAR-T and oncology: broadening chimeric antigen receptor technologies across cell types and diseases.Precision clinical medicine · 2026Review
- CD8 regulatory T cell therapy in transplantation: a new path to clinical success?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
- The Role of MicroRNAs in Treg-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: A Narrative Review Focusing on Immune-Related Diseases.Journal of immunology research · 2026Review
- Recent progress in pig-to-human kidney xenotransplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Xenotransplantation: A Prioritized Roadmap for Early Clinical Translation, Opportunities and Challenges.XenotransplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Xenotransplantation has experienced major clinical advancements over the past three years. Yet, despite potent immunosuppressive regimens combining B-cell depleting therapies, T cell activation blockade, complement inhibition, and high-dose steroids, signs of antibody-mediated and cellular rejection were seen in the few pig-to human heart and kidney xenotransplants. Considering the recent success of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies in severe refractory autoimmune diseases, there are windows for opportunities to develop novel approaches to reduce the burden of immunosuppression. In this line, regulatory T cell (Treg) therapy is an attractive strategy, as Tregs could be genetically modified to recognize pig organs. In this brief review, we summarize the lessons learned from Tregs therapies in allotransplantation, update on the recent development in Treg research for xenotransplantation, and discuss future perspectives of humanizing pigs with human leukocyte antigens to promote tolerance using engineered Tregs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.