ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Comprehensive analysis of αβT-cell receptor repertoires reveals signatures of thymic selection.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- T Cell Thoughts.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- A Donor T-Cell Receptor Structural Signature Determines Alloreactive Potential and Predicts Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- T cell receptor cross-reactivity prediction improved by a comprehensive mutational scan database.Cell systems · 2025Article
- Comprehensive epitope mutational scan database enables accurate T cell receptor cross-reactivity prediction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thymic selection is crucial for forming a pool of T-cells that can efficiently discriminate self from non-self using their T-cell receptors (TCRs) to develop adaptive immunity. In the present study we analyzed how a diverse set of physicochemical and sequence features of a TCR can affect the chances of successfully passing the selection. On a global scale we identified differences in selection probabilities based on CDR3 loop length, hydrophobicity, and residue sizes depending on variable genes and TCR chain context. We also observed a substantial decrease in N-glycosylation sites and other short sequence motifs for both alpha and beta chains. At the local scale we used dedicated statistical and machine learning methods coupled with a probabilistic model of the V(D)J rearrangement process to infer patterns in the CDR3 region that are either enriched or depleted during the course of selection. While the abundance of patterns containing poly-Glycines can improve CDR3 flexibility in selected TCRs, the "holes" in the TCR repertoire induced by negative selection can be related to Arginines in the (N)-Diversity (D)-N-region (NDN) region. Corresponding patterns were stored by us in a database available online. We demonstrated how TCR sequence composition affects lineage commitment during thymic selection. Structural modeling reveals that TCRs with "flat" and "bulged" CDR3 loops are more likely to commit T-cells to the CD4+ and CD8+ lineage respectively. Finally, we highlighted the effect of an individual MHC haplotype on the selection process, suggesting that those "holes" can be donor-specific. Our results can be further applied to identify potentially self-reactive TCRs in donor repertoires and aid in TCR selection for immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.