ArticleNature and science of sleep2025
SHAP Analysis of Machine Learning-Based Carotid Atherosclerosis Prediction of Older Adults with OSA, a Multicenter Study.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Increased Gait Variability while Texting and Walking with Added Cognitive Loads in Challenging Environments.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2026Article
- Advancements, challenges, and prospects of explainable AI in sleep disordered breathing.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Review
- Combined red blood cell distribution width and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and risk of composite cardiovascular events in patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Carotid atherosclerosis (CAS) is a critical cardiovascular complication in elderly patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Current risk assessment tools inadequately capture OSA-specific pathophysiological mechanisms for CAS prediction in this high-risk population. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 1196 elderly patients (≥60 years) with polysomnography-confirmed OSA from six tertiary hospitals in China. CAS was diagnosed by carotid ultrasound. LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) regression identified optimal predictive features from 18 candidate variables. Four machine learning algorithms were developed and validated using 5-fold cross-validation. Model interpretability was achieved through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis. Results: Among participants, 273 (22.8%) had CAS. LASSO regression selected eight optimal features. XGBoost achieved the best performance with test AUC of 0.854, accuracy of 79.8%, sensitivity of 81.2%, and specificity of 78.5%. SHAP analysis revealed systolic blood pressure (importance: 0.3148) and percentage of sleep time with oxygen saturation <90% (T90, importance: 0.2660) as the most influential predictors, surpassing traditional apnea-hypopnea index. Other significant predictors included alcohol consumption, mean oxygen saturation, body mass index, age, platelet count, and smoking status. Conclusion: This study developed the first machine learning-based CAS prediction model for elderly OSA patients, achieving clinically relevant performance (AUC=0.854). The prominence of T90 over conventional apnea-hypopnea index suggests nocturnal hypoxemic burden is more important than respiratory event frequency for cardiovascular risk stratification in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.