ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
Percutaneous Kidney Puncture Using a Novel Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound-guided Technique: First Swine Model
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: This study introduces a novel dual contrast-enhanced ultrasound (D-CEUS) technique and evaluates its feasibility and safety for an Methods: Percutaneous punctures were performed in six swine, with each animal receiving six bilateral renal punctures (upper, middle, and lower calyces). D-CEUS guidance was used for the left kidney, and conventional ultrasound was used for the right kidney. The outcomes included the first-attempt success rate, preparation time, puncture time, correct puncture rate, and vascular injury incidence. Key findings and limitations: D-CEUS demonstrated statistically significant improvements compared with conventional ultrasound, including a higher first-attempt success rate (94.4% vs 61.1%) and correct puncture rate (100% vs 66.7%), lower vascular injury (0% vs 27.8%), and shorter puncture time (median 26 vs 45 s). However, as this is a preclinical animal study, limitations remain, and clinical validation is needed. All punctures were performed under general anesthesia, followed by tract dilation to 24F along an inserted guidewire. Conclusions and clinical implications: D-CEUS provides real-time visualization of vascular anatomy and needle trajectory in a nondilated collecting system, enhancing puncture accuracy. Its ability to deliver contrast directly through the puncture needle enables precise stone localization and supports the procedure's potential to improve the safety and efficiency of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Patient summary: In this report, we applied a novel contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided technique to achieve more precise renal puncture targeting. We found that the application of the novel technique performs better than conventional ultrasound guidance in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.