ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
Criteria Used to Determine Platinum Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Results of a Physician Survey in Five European Countries.
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Although, for decades, first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) has been based on eligibility for platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin), the platinum-ineligibility criteria used by European physicians in real-world practice are unclear. This study assessed the factors and clinical thresholds used by European physicians to determine platinum ineligibility and alignment with the published US thresholds. Methods: Physicians in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK completed a quantitative online survey from August to September 2022. Physicians reported percentages of patients perceived as platinum eligible and factors considered when determining platinum ineligibility. A previous US-based survey was adapted to identify European consensus thresholds. Differences between European and US consensus thresholds were assessed using Key findings and limitations: In total, 503 physicians (69% oncologists and 31% urologists) completed the survey. Respondents reported that 77% of treated patients with mUC were platinum eligible. European (vs US) consensus thresholds for platinum ineligibility were creatinine clearance of <25 ml/min (vs <30 ml/min) or peripheral neuropathy grade ≥3 (vs grade ≥2). Consensus thresholds were the same for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥3 and New York Heart Association class III. The European consensus age threshold was 80 yr (vs no threshold in the US study). Limitations include a potential bias due to voluntary participation. Conclusions and clinical implications: European physicians considered most patients with mUC to be platinum eligible. Ineligibility criteria were broadly consistent with US results, except for age. Standardization and wider use of these criteria could support decision-making, reduce variations in care, and improve patient outcomes. Patient summary: A survey of doctors from five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK) found that most people with metastatic urothelial cancer (77%) should be able to receive platinum-based chemotherapy. The characteristics considered by European doctors to decide whether a person can receive platinum-based chemotherapy were similar to those reported previously by US doctors, except for age. Specifically, most European doctors (67%) reported that they may be reluctant to prescribe platinum-based chemotherapy to a >80-yr-old person with metastatic urothelial cancer, whereas US doctors reported that they did not consider age in their decision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.