ArticleJournal of translational autoimmunity2025
Serum test for secretory component-containing anti-citrullinated protein antibodies as a novel prognostic tool in rheumatoid arthritis at-risk subjects.
Article in Journal of translational autoimmunity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals with autoantibodies against citrullinated proteins (ACPA) and musculoskeletal symptoms face increased risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There are knowledge gaps concerning who will develop disease, and predictors of RA onset are highly warranted. A mucosal origin hypothesis in RA is gaining increasing support, for instance by a previous study showing that secretory component-containing ACPA (SC ACPA) in the circulation are prognostic for RA onset. This study aimed to confirm the prognostic value of serum SC ACPA in a large cohort of symptomatic at-risk subjects and to establish a cutoff level for the prognostic use of SC ACPA testing. Baseline sera from an observational prospective cohort of IgG ACPA positive individuals with musculoskeletal complaints (Karolinska cohort, n = 266) were tested for SC ACPA by ELISA. SC ACPA levels were increased among subjects subsequently developing arthritis (n = 100, median 62 arbitrary units (AU)/mL) compared to those who did not (n = 166, median 40 AU/mL; p < 0.001). A cutoff level for the optimal discrimination concerning future arthritis onset was established by Youden's index, resulting in 81 subjects (30 %) testing positive for SC ACPA, whereof 45 (56 %) progressed to arthritis. Among those testing negative (n = 185), significantly fewer progressed (n = 55, 30 %; p < 0.001). This cutoff was then tested in the previously studied at-risk cohort (n = 82), revealing similar prognostic performance in both cohorts (sensitivity 45 % and 41 %; specificity 78 % and 81 %). We conclude that serum SC ACPA testing is of potential clinical value in symptomatic at-risk subjects and strengthens the mucosal association in RA development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.