Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050541›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2025

Validation of the Jefferson health-related social needs screener.

Sara Beachy, Kristin L Rising, Richard W Hass, Terry Hyslop, Isabella Muti, Mackenzie Kemp, Rhea E Powell, Cara Martino, Baligh R Yehia, Joseph G Cacchione and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sara BeachyDepartment of Psychiatry, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Kristin L RisingCenter for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Richard W HassCollege of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Terry HyslopDepartment of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Isabella MutiSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Mackenzie KempCenter for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Rhea E PowellDepartment of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Cara MartinoJefferson Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Baligh R YehiaSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Joseph G CacchioneJefferson Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Patricia HenwoodDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Screening for health-related social needs (HRSN) is a growing national health priority. While multiple HRSN screening tools currently exist, none to our knowledge have been evaluated using robust statistical analyses. The goal of this work is to provide results from a validation study of the Jefferson HRSN screener conducted across inpatient and outpatient settings. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional psychometric study included HRSN assessments conducted across inpatient and outpatient settings with adult patients from March 2023 to May 2024. The study was conducted across a 17-hospital academic health system serving a diverse community in a 9-county area crossing two states Results: The final sample included data from 302,929 adults. Patients were relatively evenly distributed across ages (< 45 years, 32%; 45-64 years, 32%; 65-84 years, 30%; 85+, 4%). Most patients were Non-Hispanic (87%), White (66%), and female (59%). A third of patients were in the medium-high (18%) and high (15%) SVI areas. Positive responses across questions ranged from 0.90%-5.90%. Slopes ranged between 1.67-3.77, and difficulty parameters ranged between 2.20-3.31, indicating that the items can detect a high level of need. LCA results suggested that the eight HRSN items combined with basic demographic variables could help identify people with higher HRSN. Discussion: The Jefferson HRSN screener provides a valid approach for HRSN screening across healthcare settings. The eight screening questions, combined with additional questions to evaluate the patient's desire for help and urgency, can be used to identify patients needing additional resources to address fundamental social needs potentially contributing to health disparities.

Indexed as

health disparitieshealth equityhealth-related social needspsychometricssocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID41050541
PMCPMC12491173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.