Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050517›Full record

ArticleJB & JS open access

The Missing Revision Burden: Total Hip and Knee Replacement Revision Rates in the United States, 1996 to 2020.

Timothy Bhattacharyya, Gourinandan Saravanan, Suhyeon Yoon, Subrata Paul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Timothy BhattacharyyaNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4041-3320
Gourinandan SaravananNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9441-8941
Suhyeon YoonIntegrated Data Sciences Section, Research Technologies Branch, NIAID/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Subrata PaulIntegrated Data Sciences Section, Research Technologies Branch, NIAID/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4482-3338

Funding

Clinical Support Services for the NIAMS Intramural Research ProgramZIDAR041180 · NIAMS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES · PI COLBERT, ROBERT · 2009 to 2025
$119.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZID AR041180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rising volumes of primary hip and knee replacements, coupled with longer lifespans, have led to projections of revision surgeries becoming a significant cost and healthcare burden. However, techniques and technology have improved. The purpose of this study was to determine whether revision hip and knee arthroplasty incidence has risen as previously predicted in the United States. Methods: This retrospective serial cross-sectional study analyzed data on primary and revision hip and knee replacements from the National Inpatient Sample, a comprehensive US hospitalization database, from 1996 to 2020. Primary outcome was the incidence of primary and revision arthroplasty. Secondary outcomes were comparisons between observed revision volumes and predictions, as well as trends in indications for revision surgery. Results: From 1996 to 2019, the incidence of primary hip replacements increased by 156%, from 128 to 328 per 100,000 person-years. The incidence of revision hip replacements increased by 41%, from 24 to 34 per 100,000 person-years. The incidence of primary knee replacements increased 136% from 220 to 520 per 100,000 person-years, while the incidence of revision knee replacements rose by 147%, from 19 to 47 per 100,000 person-years. Modeling a 10% failure rate at 10 years, revision hip replacement volumes were 41% lower than expected. Modelling a 7% failure rate at 10 years, revision knee replacement volumes were 33% lower than expected. The proportion of revisions due to loosening and implant wear decreased significantly over the last decade: for hip replacements, from 34.3% to 20.7% (p < 0.001), and for knee replacements, from 49.2% to 28.5% (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The burden of revision surgeries, especially due to implant wear, is significantly lower than anticipated. These data suggest improving longevity, which may support surgeon and patient confidence in arthroplasty durability.

Identifiers

PMID41050517
PMCPMC12494052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.