Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050510›Full record

ReviewAlcohol research : current reviews2025

A Narrative Review of Alcohol Prevention Interventions Among Older Adults.

Alexis Kuerbis, Silke Behrendt, Alex Elswick, Amy F Kostelic, Simone Schultz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alcohol research : current reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexis KuerbisSilberman School of Social Work, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-6948-0669
Silke BehrendtDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Alex ElswickMartin-Gatton College of Agriculture Food and Environment, School of Human Environmental Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Amy F KostelicMartin-Gatton College of Agriculture Food and Environment, School of Human Environmental Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Simone SchultzH.A.R.M.O.N.Y. Mental Health Counseling Services, Brooklyn, New York and Social Welfare, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlcohol use and alcohol use disorder (AUD) among adults age 50 and older are an expanding public health challenge, requiring effective alcohol prevention interventions. Empirical literature on prevention interventions among older adults is limited by design issues, lack of publication, and misconceptions of aging. To enhance scientific rigor, prior reviews of prevention interventions among older adults excluded pre-to-posttest studies and studies with subgroups, such as veterans, racial minorities, and individuals who seek out digital interventions. The current narrative review aims to understand with whom prevention interventions for older adults are tested; describe barriers and facilitators of successful interventions; and include perspectives of both older adults and intervention providers. Unlike prior reviews, it includes a range of study designs, including digital interventions, and examines decade of age, periods in which studies took place, and generational factors associated with prevention intervention success. SEARCH

methodsIn December 2024, Boolean search terms, such as "alcohol*," "older adults," and "intervention," were used across medical and social science databases, including PubMed, World of Science, PsycInfo, Social Sciences Citation Index, Cochrane Database, and other sources. The searches identified 983 articles published between 1999 and 2024, 582 of which were duplicates. Of the 401 abstracts reviewed, 231 did not mention older adults and/or alcohol. Thus, 170 full texts were reviewed. To be included, studies had to be peer-reviewed; have a mean participant age of 55 and older or a labeled subsample of individuals age 50 and older; focus on a nonpharmacological intervention; and reported alcohol or alcohol-related outcomes or older adult and/or provider perspectives of interventions. Studies set in a formal substance use treatment program were excluded. Overall, 84 records describing 51 interventions and 16 articles of consumer and provider perspectives were synthesized. SEARCH

resultsStudies were categorized into primary prevention, secondary prevention of AUD, and tertiary prevention of worsening AUD. Most interventions were delivered in person, in primary care, with individuals born from 1901 to 1923 (Greatest Generation) and 1924 to 1945 (The Silent Generation), and yielded significant reductions in alcohol use and related consequences. Only The Silent Generation consistently responded to interventions, demonstrating large effects. Additionally, two out of 18 randomized controlled trials found that individuals born from 1946 to 1964 (Baby Boomers) significantly responded to prevention interventions. Digital interventions were successful across generations. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsBarriers to successful interventions occur at the organizational, provider, and older adult levels. Prevention intervention facilitators include drink tracking, agreement with another person, and aligning tone of the intervention to older adult perspectives of their drinking and perceived need to change. Adapting prevention interventions to older adults could include tailoring to an individual's identity, culture, and meaning behind their drinking, which is often defined by generation, rather than only by age.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholismAgedHumansMiddle Agedalcoholalcohol use disordergenerationolder adultsprevention interventionprimary preventionsecondary preventiontertiary prevention

Identifiers

PMID41050510
PMCPMC12494362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.