ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2025
Leveraging pharmacy partnerships and Grant funding to improve access to medications for opioid use disorder.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association Between Integrated Treatment Services and Access to Detoxification and MOUD Across US Treatment Facilities.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Increased availability and access to FDA-approved medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) can improve efforts to address the ongoing opioid public health crisis. Pharmacist collaboration is essential yet often inconsistent in MOUD access. This unpredictability creates a treatment bottleneck, especially in rural areas. Objective: To investigate the reasons for independent pharmacies' reluctance to collaborate with the Mississippi Horizons Project, a program designed to improve patient access to MOUD. Methods: A Horizons team member contacted pharmacies using a script to inquire about accepting payment for a patient's MOUD prescription. Pharmacist responses about collaboration (i.e., collaborated or denied collaboration) after initial contact and follow-up were summarized. A single coder inductively derived categories within which responses about collaboration were totaled. Results: After initial contact and follow-up, only slightly more than half of pharmacies contacted (53.5 %) collaborated with the Horizons project to accept payment for and dispense MOUD. Categories for non-collaboration included regulatory misperceptions, unfamiliarity with patients and providers, and payment and logistical barriers. Successful efforts for collaboration after initial contact included utilizing existing relationships with pharmacies and providing additional information about the Horizons project. Conclusion: Integrating educational interventions with structural and policy measures, while fostering collaborative partnerships with pharmacies and other key stakeholders, can help increase familiarity, reduce stigma, address operational challenges, and enhance cooperation to increase pharmacy collaboration and MOUD access to patients in rural areas and nationwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.