ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Current clinical and translational challenges in temporomandibular joint reconstruction.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Workflow in Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering: From Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) to Personalized Bioceramic Implants.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Functional Biomaterials and 3D Bioprinting Approaches for Temporomandibular Joint Reconstruction: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- TMJ Replacement as a System: Results of an International Surgeon Survey on Design, Fixation, Materials, and Digital Workflow.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2026Article
- Evolving Horizons in Temporomandibular Joint Total Replacement: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Total joint reconstruction (TJR) is essential for the management of end-stage temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders. Current reconstruction techniques include the use of autologous grafts, such as chondrocostal tissue or fibula, and alloplastic TMJ replacement systems. Commercially available TMJ replacement systems provide both stock and customized prostheses. Advances in computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technology, three-dimensional printing, and virtual surgical planning have accelerated the trend toward individualized TMJ prostheses, enhancing anatomical adaptation, intraoperative efficiency, and postoperative outcomes. A promising alternative under preclinical investigation is TMJ tissue engineering, a regenerative approach utilizing scaffolds, stem cells, and growth factors to reconstruct specific TMJ components, including the skeletal condyle, fibrocartilaginous disc, and glenoid fossa. Bioprinting has further transformed the field by enabling the creation of complex, multi-tissue structures with cellular viability and functionality. Techniques such as integrated tissue and organ printing and volumetric printing have shown promise for enhancing graft performance by improving scaffold heterogeneity. However, these advanced approaches remain in the preclinical stage and require critical evaluation before clinical translation. Despite these advancements, challenges such as high costs, technical complexities, and the need for extensive, robust datasets persist. Continued research into novel biomaterials, advanced biofabrication techniques, and digital surgical technologies, supported by larger preclinical and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.