Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050436›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2025

Barriers, facilitators and recommendations for the implementation of newborn sickle cell screening program in tribal communities: findings from a qualitative multicentric study in India.

Nithin Rajamani, Apoorva Pandey, Suchitra Surve, Shrey Desai, Ragini Kulkarni, Ravi Gajbhiye, Rajasubramaniam Shanmugam, Kapilkumar Dave, Anna Salomi Kerketta, Suman Sundar Mohanty and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. India's digital-first approach to sickle cell disease elimination.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Nithin RajamaniICMR-National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Apoorva PandeyICMR-Head Quarters, New Delhi, India.
Suchitra SurveICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Shrey DesaiSociety for Education Welfare and Action Rural (SEWA Rural), Jhagadia, Gujarat, India.
Ragini KulkarniICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Ravi GajbhiyeICMR-Centre for Research, Management and Control of Haemoglobinopathies, Chandrapur, Maharashtra, India.
Rajasubramaniam ShanmugamICMR-National Institute of Research in Tribal Health, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Kapilkumar DaveSociety for Education Welfare and Action Rural (SEWA Rural), Jhagadia, Gujarat, India.
Anna Salomi KerkettaICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Suman Sundar MohantyICMR-National Institute for Implementation Research on Non-Communicable Diseases, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Mahendra ThakorICMR-National Institute of Occupational Health, Ahmedabad, India.
Kalpita GawitICMR-Centre for Research, Management and Control of Haemoglobinopathies, Chandrapur, Maharashtra, India.
Lakshmana BharathiNilgiri Adivasi Welfare Association, Kotagiri, Tamil Nadu, India.
M AlwasNilgiri Adivasi Welfare Association, Kotagiri, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anita NadkarniICMR-National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Prabhakar KedarICMR-National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Yogeshwar KalkondeSangwari - People's Association for Equity and Health, Chhattisgarh, India.
Saritha NairICMR-Head Quarters, New Delhi, India.
Harpreet KaurICMR-Head Quarters, New Delhi, India.
Manisha MadkaikarICMR-National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Newborn screening for sickle cell disease (NBS for SCD) is essential for timely detection and management. In 2019, a study encompassing early screening, follow-up, and comprehensive care for SCD babies was undertaken in seven SCD-prevalent tribal regions of India. The study also aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators affecting its implementation. Methods: A qualitative exploratory descriptive approach was used to conduct in-depth interviews with purposively selected participants (n = 127) including parents of newborns with SCD. The data were compiled and analysed using NVivo14. Predominant themes were identified through frequency analysis and the number of references, and they were further classified using the Multilevel Ecological Model of Health (MEMH). Findings: Twenty-five themes emerged, of which thirteen highlighted barriers, the predominant ones being stigma & local beliefs, lack of integration of NBS with the health system, accessibility challenges and difficulties with blood sample collection & testing. Seven themes addressed facilitators such as the inclusion of frontline health workers, skilled human resources and regular follow-ups. Five themes emerged for recommendations including integrating NBS for SCD into the health system, behaviour change communication and enhanced stakeholder collaboration. Interpretation: The study identified barriers and facilitators across multiple levels, advocating the need for a holistic approach. The findings suggest that a comprehensive SCD management program must address socio-cultural dimensions and effectively integrate with the health system, providing valuable insights for shaping policies for NBS in SCD-prevalent areas. Funding: The study was funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research.

Indexed as

BarriersFacilitatorsMultilevel ecological model of healthNewborn screeningQualitativeSickle cell diseaseSocial stigma

Identifiers

PMID41050436
PMCPMC12495235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.