Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050428›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2025

Therapeutic benefit of the most expensive drugs covered by Medicare and Medicaid.

Tiffany Enxia Jiang, Reshma Ramachandran, Kerstin N Vokinger, Joseph S Ross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tiffany Enxia JiangYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1943-0962
Reshma RamachandranYale Collaboration for Regulatory Rigor, Integrity and Transparency, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3845-3606
Kerstin N VokingerFaculty of Law, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6997-7384
Joseph S RossYale Collaboration for Regulatory Rigor, Integrity and Transparency, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9218-3320

Funding

Short Term Research Training: Students in Health Professional SchoolsT35DK104689 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LLOYD G CANTLEY, Sarwat I Chaudhry · 2015 to 2026
$2.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS T35 DK104689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The United States began drug pricing negotiations in 2024 under the Affordable Care Act. Evaluating the therapeutic benefit of drugs will help guide pricing decisions and are an opportunity to improve healthcare affordability. Discussion: We conducted a cross-sectional study of the 50 most expensive drugs by dosage unit covered by Medicare Part B, Medicare Part D, and Medicaid in 2022. We reported their level of clinical benefit as evaluated by health technology assessment agencies in France and Germany, their level of innovation as rated by the Food and Drug Administration of the United States, and their safety and effectiveness ratings as measured by Prescrire International, an independent French organisation that evaluates medicines. Our study found that among the 50 most expensive drugs in the U.S. covered by Medicare and Medicaid in 2022, 28 (56%) were rated by French and German HTAs as having low therapeutic benefit and most (n = 20; 40%) were rated by Prescrire International as having poor effectiveness-safety ratings. Almost all (n = 48; 96%) drugs were ineligible under current exclusion criteria for price negotiations. Conclusion: Many of the most expensive drugs were rated as having low added clinical benefit. As the US begins price negotiations under the Inflation Reduction Act, understanding the clinical value of drugs may help inform debates over drug affordability.

Indexed as

clinical benefitDrug pricinghealthcare affordabilityhealth technology assessmentsInflation Reduction Act

Identifiers

PMID41050428
PMCPMC12490368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.