ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Active ingredients isolated from
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by colonic mucosal inflammation, compromised intestinal barrier function, and gut microbiota dysbiosis. Current therapies often have significant limitations, including adverse effects, highlighting the need for safer alternatives. Materials: To address this gap, this study investigated the composition and therapeutic activity of PAW and its sequentially fractionated components based on molecular weight: PAW1 (< 3 kDa), PAW2 (3-10 kDa), and PAW3 (> 10 kDa) using membrane separation. Using a dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced UC model in C57BL/6 mice, we compared the effects of unfractionated PA and its fractions (PAW1, PAW2, PAW3) on UC pathology and intestinal flora. Results: Our results demonstrate that PA, PAW1, PAW2, and PAW3 ameliorated key UC-associated pathologic features; notably, the unfractionated PA exhibited superior efficacy compared to its individual fractions. PA treatment significantly mitigated DSS-induced body weight loss, disease activity index scores, and colon shortening. It preserved intestinal mucosal integrity, evidenced by increased goblet cell numbers and elevated expression of tight junction proteins (occludin-1, ZO-1). PA treatment reduced colonic inflammation by significantly downregulating pro-inflammatory mediators (NF-κB-p65, TLR4, MyD88, TNF-α, IL-17A, IFN-γ, MPO, iNOS) and upregulating the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, while IL-4 levels were also modulated. Furthermore, PA treatment attenuated intestinal dysbiosis in UC mice, characterized by an increase in beneficial bacteria (e.g., Conclusion: These findings collectively indicate that the aqueous extract of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.