Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050390›Full record

ReviewArab journal of urology2025

Artificial intelligence in urology: Revolutionizing diagnostics and treatment planning.

Kirolos Eskandar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arab journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kirolos EskandarGeneral Medicine, Diakonie Klinik, Mosbach, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0085-3284

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the field of urology, offering unprecedented advancements in diagnostics and treatment planning. This review explores the integration of AI across various urological practices, highlighting its impact on improving diagnostic accuracy, optimizing treatment strategies, and enhancing patient monitoring. We examine the role of AI in imaging, pathology, and personalized medicine, as well as its contributions to robotic-assisted surgeries and remote patient care. The article also addresses the ethical and legal challenges posed by AI, including issues of data privacy, algorithmic bias, and regulatory oversight. Despite these challenges, the potential of AI to revolutionize urology is immense, promising more precise, efficient, and patient-centered care. As AI technologies continue to evolve, their integration into urology will likely lead to significant improvements in patient outcomes and the overall quality of care.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencediagnosticspersonalized medicinerobotic surgeryurology

Identifiers

PMID41050390
PMCPMC12493613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.