Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050380›Full record

ArticleArab journal of urology2025

To sheath or not to sheath in flexible ureteroscopy: A randomized controlled trial.

A M Tawfeek, Mohamed Mostafa Elsayed Osman, M Sherif Mourad, Mohammed Metwally Sadeq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arab journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A M TawfeekUrology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2534-2261
Mohamed Mostafa Elsayed OsmanUrology, Ain Shams General Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
M Sherif MouradUrology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohammed Metwally SadeqUrology, Faculty of Medicine, Suez University, Suez, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4558-9690

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of employing UAS compared to not using UAS in FURS concerning stone-free rate, operative duration, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Methods: A total of 120 patients presenting with symptomatic upper ureteric and renal stones were recruited and allocated into two equal groups. Group A underwent flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) without using ureteral access sheaths (UAS), while Group B underwent FURS with UAS. Results: There were no statistically significant differences among the groups for the Stone-free rate, operative duration, length of hospital stay, and postoperative pain, with p-values of 0.543, 0.122, 0.639, and 0.083, respectively. However, group A experienced a significantly higher occurrence of postoperative complications, affecting 14 patients (23.3%), compared to five patients (8.3%) in group B, with a p-value of less than 0.05. These complications mainly presented as postoperative fever and urosepsis. Conclusion: Utilizing UAS alongside Flexible ureteroscopy had no impact on stone-free rate, operative time, hospital stay, or intraoperative complications. However, it notably lowered postoperative infective complications.

Indexed as

access sheath in FURSFlexible ureteroscopypostoperative infectionrenal stones

Identifiers

PMID41050380
PMCPMC12493598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.