Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050351›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

Machine learning-based assessment of condylar changes after orthognathic surgery of asymmetric dentofacial deformities.

Jin Tang, Jiayu Shi, Shuguang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jin Tang *Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jiayu Shi *Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shuguang LiuStomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This retrospective study aimed to investigate three-dimensional (3D) condyle change including volumetric, positional, rotational alterations in patients with asymmetric dentofacial deformities immediate and long after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Methods: The sample included 36 patients who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery, with a maxillomandibular dental midline deviation >3 mm, excluding those with class II/III malocclusions and craniofacial syndrome. A fully automated deep learning-based assessment method was used to analyze the volume, position and rotation of condyle based on Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compared the changes at three intervals-pre-surgery (T0), one-week post-surgery (T1), and six months post-surgery (T2)-of the deviated sides and non-deviated sides condyle. Results: The condyle on the deviated side was smaller than that on the non-deviated side, with significant volume reductions observed six months post-surgery on the deviated side. Several condylar changes were observed immediately after surgery, though of small magnitude, and it mostly tended to return to their original positions 6 months after surgery. However, the condyle rotated laterally on the deviated side and medially on the non-deviated side post operation and in long-term. Conclusion: For patients with asymmetry, condyle on the deviated side undergo greater remodeling than the non-deviated side after orthognathic surgery. There are measurable rotations in the coronal plane of condyle on both sides.

Indexed as

asymmetryautomated methodscondyleorthognathic surgerytemporomandibular joint

Identifiers

PMID41050351
PMCPMC12488556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.