ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Machine learning-based assessment of condylar changes after orthognathic surgery of asymmetric dentofacial deformities.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Assisted 3D Analysis of Coronoid Process Changes After Orthognathic Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This retrospective study aimed to investigate three-dimensional (3D) condyle change including volumetric, positional, rotational alterations in patients with asymmetric dentofacial deformities immediate and long after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Methods: The sample included 36 patients who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery, with a maxillomandibular dental midline deviation >3 mm, excluding those with class II/III malocclusions and craniofacial syndrome. A fully automated deep learning-based assessment method was used to analyze the volume, position and rotation of condyle based on Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compared the changes at three intervals-pre-surgery (T0), one-week post-surgery (T1), and six months post-surgery (T2)-of the deviated sides and non-deviated sides condyle. Results: The condyle on the deviated side was smaller than that on the non-deviated side, with significant volume reductions observed six months post-surgery on the deviated side. Several condylar changes were observed immediately after surgery, though of small magnitude, and it mostly tended to return to their original positions 6 months after surgery. However, the condyle rotated laterally on the deviated side and medially on the non-deviated side post operation and in long-term. Conclusion: For patients with asymmetry, condyle on the deviated side undergo greater remodeling than the non-deviated side after orthognathic surgery. There are measurable rotations in the coronal plane of condyle on both sides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.