ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Assessment of efficacy of lignocaine patch in pain management post third molar extraction: A prospective, split mouth study.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Postoperative pain following third molar extractions is a significant concern, often managed using opioids and NSAIDs, associated with considerable side effects. Lignocaine patches, known for their localized action and minimal systemic effects, have shown promise in managing various pain conditions. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 5 % lignocaine patches in reducing postoperative pain following third molar extractions. Methodology: A prospective, split-mouth study was conducted on 30 patients aged 18-40 years requiring bilateral extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Post extraction on one side (test lignocaine patches were applied postoperatively, while post extraction of contralateral side, standard oral analgesics were given. Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on the day of extraction, postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 2. Additional patches or analgesics were provided if pain exceeded VAS thresholds. Results: The test group reported significantly lower mean VAS scores (1.96 ± 0.72) compared to the control group (2.55 ± 0.35, Conclusion: These findings suggest that 5 % lignocaine patches offer an effective alternative to oral analgesics for managing postoperative pain after third molar extractions. Further research, however, is recommended to explore their potential in reducing opioid use and their effectiveness in other minor oral surgical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.