Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050333›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research

Artificial intelligence in dental age estimation- applications, technological advances and legal aspects: A narrative review.

Abhinav Chopra, Anand Gupta, Naveen Aggarwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abhinav ChopraDepartment of Dentistry, Govt. Medical College and Hospital, Sector-32, Chandigarh, India.
Anand GuptaDepartment of Dentistry, Govt. Medical College and Hospital, Sector-32, Chandigarh, India.
Naveen AggarwalDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University Institute of Engineering and Technology (UIET), Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dental age estimation constitutes a cornerstone in forensic odontology, pediatric dentistry, and medico-legal investigations. Traditional radiographic methods such as those by Demirjian, Willems, and Cameriere, though widely validated, are limited by examiner subjectivity, population-specific calibration, and low scalability. This narrative review examines the current landscape of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven dental age estimation, with a focus on deep learning technologies, comparative advantages over conventional methodologies, and applicability across clinical, forensic, and legal domains. Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify original studies and systematic reviews that employed machine learning (ML) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for dental age estimation using panoramic radiographs or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Emphasis was placed on studies reporting model architecture, mean absolute error (MAE), classification accuracy, and external validation. Results: AI-based models, particularly CNNs, demonstrated superior diagnostic performance with MAEs ranging from 0.03 to 0.7 years and classification accuracies exceeding 90 % at critical legal thresholds. These systems provide automated tooth detection, segmentation, and staging, with outputs that are rapid, objective, and reproducible. Nonetheless, critical limitations persist, including algorithmic opacity, demographic bias due to non-representative training datasets, and absence of international validation standards. Conclusion: AI technologies represent a paradigm shift in dental age estimation, offering enhanced precision and operational efficiency. To facilitate clinical translation and forensic admissibility, future efforts must prioritize population-diverse training datasets, transparent algorithmic design, and consensus-driven regulatory frameworks.

Identifiers

PMID41050333
PMCPMC12495456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.