ReviewInternational journal of general medicine2025
Acupuncture for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.
Review in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acupuncture has been extensively applied in the clinical management of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). This overview aims to systematically summarize the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of CSR, as well as to assess the methodological rigor and quality of evidence of the included studies. Methods: A comprehensive literature search for systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted across four Chinese and five international databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and Chongqing VIP).The literature search was conducted from the inception of each database to May 2025 (1996-2025). The PRISMA 2020 statement, AMSTAR 2, ROBIS, and GRADE tools were used to assess reporting quality, methodological quality, risk of bias, and evidence strength. Qualitative and quantitative evaluations were also performed on the results. Results: Six SR/MA studies were included. One study had relatively complete reporting with a PRISMA score of 24.5, while five showed reporting deficiencies (scores 18-20). All six studies scored very low on methodological quality according to AMSTAR 2. Only one study was rated as low risk of bias by ROBIS, while five were high risk. GRADE assessment of 41 outcomes showed 2.4% moderate quality, 24.3% low quality, and 73.2% very low quality, mainly downgraded due to study design limitations and publication bias. Conclusion: Acupuncture combined with conventional treatment may provide therapeutic benefits for CSR patients compared to conventional treatment alone. However, the safety of acupuncture for CSR has not been systematically evaluated, and the overall evidence quality is low, so conclusions should be interpreted cautiously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.