ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025
Persistent obstacles for return to work after COVID-19 infection - an explorative follow-up study in Sweden.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors influencing work ability and return-to-work in individuals affected by post-COVID: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Neuropsychological consequences three years post-covid-19 are persistent and have great impact on everyday activities.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Design aim and method: To explore in patients with postcovid-19 condition the influence of various factors on return to work in the year following diagnosis. The study had an explorative quantitative and qualitative design based on interviews with 41 hospitalized (HC) and 63 primary care (PC) COVID-19 patients. RTW was described at 3 and 12 months, and differences between groups, changes over time and possible factors explaining RTW were analysed statistically. Qualitative analyses with content analysis of interviews were performed to describe obstacles to work. Result: The obstacles for RTW were persistent symptoms such as fatigue, cognitive dysfunction and breathlessness with the consequences for work as lack of energy, decreased physical capability, decreased mental stamina, reduced cognitive ability, increased sensitivity to stress and general reduced capacity. At 12 months, 50% and 70% of patients in the PC and HC groups, respectively, had returned to full-time work, while 20% of patients in both groups had not RTW at all. To function at work, many patients expressed that they required adaptations. RTW was not dependent on the initial severity of COVID-19 or type of work. The likelihood of RTW was higher in males with COVID-19 onset during the second wave. Conclusion: RTW may be limited after COVID-19 infection, regardless of its initial severity. Women with persistent covid had greater difficulty than men in returning to work. Limitations were due to a general reduced capacity mainly caused by physical and mental fatigue, and cognitive dysfunction. However, the support from employers and the environment also has an impact on the RTW. If necessary, appropriate rehabilitation measures should be offered and adaptations of work content and the organization of the work at the workplace are of great importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.