ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025
The Level of Malocclusion Treatment Needs between Stunting and Nonstunting Children Based on Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need.
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims and background: To identify the need for treatment of malocclusion in the mixed dentition among stunting and nonstunting children in Tajinan District, Malang using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). Materials and methods: Children with mixed dentition ( Results: Among stunting children, 46.7% showed no need or little need for treatment, 43.3% had borderline treatment needs, and 10% had significant treatment needs based on DHC scores. Regarding EC scores in stunting children, 63.3% required no or little treatment, while 36.7% needed borderline treatment. Among nonstunting children, 73.3% had no or little treatment needs, 10% had borderline needs, and 16.7% had significant needs based on DHC scores. In terms of AC scores among nonstunting children, 70% required no or little treatment, 26.7% needed moderate treatment, and 3.3% needed significant treatment. Conclusion: This study shows that attractive anterior teeth do not always reflect overall good oral health conditions, emphasizing the importance of malocclusion treatment even when anterior teeth look good. Children with stunting may experience growth delays, but there is an opportunity to catch-up growth until the age of 2 years. Clinical significance: There is a significant difference in the level of malocclusion treatment need based on DHC scores, but there is no significant difference in AC scores. How to cite this article: Nelwan SC, Pradopo S, Nowwarote N,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.