Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050289›Full record

ArticlePerspectives of the ASHA special interest groups2025

Testing Very Preterm Black Children to Examine Potential Assessment Bias in Two Language Tests.

Lauren Prather, Nancy Creaghead, Jennifer Vannest, Lisa Hunter, Amy Hobek, Tamika Odum, Mekibib Altaye, Juanita Lackey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lauren PratherDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Nancy CreagheadDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Jennifer VannestDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Lisa HunterDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Amy HobekDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Tamika OdumDepartment of Behavioral Science - Blue Ash College, University of Cincinnati.
Mekibib AltayeDivision of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Juanita LackeyDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E., KISSELA, BRETT M · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
A New Model to Identify Preterm Neonates at High-Risk for Cognitive Impairments and School ReadinessR01NS094200 · NINDS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI NEHAL A. PARIKH · 2016 to 2026
$6.7M
Supplement - Earliest Predictors of Language Outcomes in High-risk InfantsR01DC018734 · NIDCD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI HUNTER, LISA LEIGH, VANNEST, JENNIFER J. · 2020 to 2024
$3.8M
Early Prediction of Cerebral Palsy in Premature Infants using Advanced MRI BiomarkersR01NS096037 · NINDS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI PARIKH, NEHAL A. · 2016 to 2020
$2.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018734NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094200NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS096037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The lack of appropriate assessments affects populations presumed to be most at risk for speech and language concerns, one of them being children with a history of preterm birth. This study aims to examine whether bias is present in the currently available tests for Black children under age three to examine potential cultural bias in the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales (CSBS) and the MacArthur Bates Communicative Inventory (CDI). Method: This study uses data from the Results: There was no significant difference between CSBS scores of Black and White children. There were no significant differences between the Black and White children's total scores on the CDI: WG based on the parent responses. There was a weak correlation between the CSBS and the CDI: WG Gesture subtests scores for the total group and a moderate correlation for Black children. Conclusion: The comparison of scores on the CSBS and the CDI: WG showed no significant difference between the Black and White children, indicating that there may not be evidence to support bias for the premature children in this study. The correlation between the gestural subtest of the CSBS and the CDI: WG showed that direct observation by clinicians was similar to the observations of the parents.

Indexed as

assessment biasBlack childrenCDI: WGCSBSearly languageoutcomesvery preterm

Identifiers

PMID41050289
PMCPMC12490789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.