Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050280›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Radiomics-based machine learning model for predicting clinically ineffective reperfusion in acute ischaemic stroke patients after endovascular treatment.

Xiaolong Hu, Suya Li, Shifei Ye, Zhiliang Ding, Peng Li, Yibin Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaolong Hu *Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai 4th People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Suya Li *Department of Neurovascular Disease, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai 4th People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Shifei YeDepartment of Neurovascular Disease, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai 4th People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Zhiliang DingNanjing Medical University Affiliated Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Peng LiDepartment of Neurovascular Disease, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai 4th People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Yibin FangTongji University Affiliated Shanghai 4th People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) undergoing endovascular treatment may have a poor prognosis, even with successful recanalization. This study aims to evaluate a machine learning model based on CT-thrombosis radiomics to assess clinically ineffective reperfusion (CIR) after endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with AIS. Methods: A total of 144 patients from two centres were included in this study, spanning from December 2021 to October 2024. The participants were randomly divided into a training set (70%) and a test set (30%). Patient outcomes were defined as clinically ineffective reperfusion (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction, TICI ≥2b, three-month post-surgery modified Rankin Scale, mRS ≥3) and effective reperfusion (TICI ≥2b, three-month post-surgery mRS <3). A total of 1,702 features were extracted from the intrathrombus and perithrombus regions. The minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm were used for feature selection to construct the machine learning model, with the AUC of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve used for model evaluation. Results: In the test set, the random forest (RF) model demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance among all the models (RF_INTRA AUC = 0.78, RF_PERI AUC = 0.76, RF_F AUC = 0.83). Conclusion: The machine learning model based on intrathrombus and perithrombus radiomics features can accurately predict clinically ineffective reperfusion in patients after EVT. However, further study is needed to validate these findings in larger, independent cohorts and explore the broader clinical applicability of the model.

Indexed as

clinically ineffective reperfusionmachine learningradiomicsstrokethrombus

Identifiers

PMID41050280
PMCPMC12488429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.