ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Radiomics-based machine learning model for predicting clinically ineffective reperfusion in acute ischaemic stroke patients after endovascular treatment.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) undergoing endovascular treatment may have a poor prognosis, even with successful recanalization. This study aims to evaluate a machine learning model based on CT-thrombosis radiomics to assess clinically ineffective reperfusion (CIR) after endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with AIS. Methods: A total of 144 patients from two centres were included in this study, spanning from December 2021 to October 2024. The participants were randomly divided into a training set (70%) and a test set (30%). Patient outcomes were defined as clinically ineffective reperfusion (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction, TICI ≥2b, three-month post-surgery modified Rankin Scale, mRS ≥3) and effective reperfusion (TICI ≥2b, three-month post-surgery mRS <3). A total of 1,702 features were extracted from the intrathrombus and perithrombus regions. The minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm were used for feature selection to construct the machine learning model, with the AUC of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve used for model evaluation. Results: In the test set, the random forest (RF) model demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance among all the models (RF_INTRA AUC = 0.78, RF_PERI AUC = 0.76, RF_F AUC = 0.83). Conclusion: The machine learning model based on intrathrombus and perithrombus radiomics features can accurately predict clinically ineffective reperfusion in patients after EVT. However, further study is needed to validate these findings in larger, independent cohorts and explore the broader clinical applicability of the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.