ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Development of a wrist and hand stretching device for managing spasticity in stroke patients: a pilot study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We developed a straightforward stretching device for the wrist and hand. To assess the device's effectiveness in managing spasticity among chronic stroke patients. Methods: The device, primarily constructed from plastic, comprises a forearm support module, a wrist module, and a finger module. Twenty stroke patients used the device four times daily, 7 days a week, for 1 month. Spasticity severity was measured using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) for the wrist, thumb, and index fingers. A questionnaire evaluated the device's feasibility and areas for improvement. Results: Before treatment, the mean MAS scores for the wrist, thumb, and index finger flexors were 1.50 ± 0.36, 1.52 ± 0.34, and 1.50 ± 0.30, respectively, compared with 1.25 ± 0.26, 1.27 ± 0.30, and 1.32 ± 0.33 post-intervention. Patients and occupational therapists expressed satisfaction with the device, citing its ease of use, effectiveness in stretching the wrist and fingers, and overall ease of manipulation. Half of the patients reported that all fingers were easily extended. The rigid plastic finger module was subsequently replaced with an inflatable, flexible rubber ball, providing a more comfortable contour for the stretched fingers, which increased user satisfaction. Conclusion: The stretching device effectively reduced spasticity in the wrist and hand, and the upgraded device enhanced patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.