ReviewActa clinica Croatica2024
FROM THE ARCHIVES OF THE ZAGREB ANTIRABIES CLINIC: HOSPITALIZED PERSONS DUE TO ANIMAL BITES FROM 2007 TO 2021 (PART TWO).
Review in Acta clinica Croatica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cat-Related Injuries and Rabies Exposure: A Three-Decade Retrospective Analysis from the Zagreb Antirabies Clinic (1995-2025).Viruses · 2026Article
- Clinic-based characteristics of animal-related injury presentations in Hangzhou, China: a 10-year retrospective analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- FROM THE ARCHIVES OF THE ZAGREB ANTIRABIES CLINIC: HOSPITALIZED PERSONS DUE TO ANIMAL BITES FROM 2007 TO 2021 (PART TWO).Acta clinica Croatica · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to present data on hospitalized patients in Zagreb clinics and hospitals, from 2007 to 2021. This paper is a continuation of our previous paper, but for a different time period. All data were collected from the official patient registry of the Zagreb Antirabies Clinic, which operates within the Reference Center for Rabies at Andrija Štampar Teaching Institute of Public Health. During this period, there were 9960 patients examined for injuries inflicted by animals, of which 98 (0.98%) were hospitalized in different departments and hospitals in Zagreb due to wound severity. All the hospitalized patients were examined to exclude the possible risk of rabies. The official patient registry of the Zagreb Antirabies Clinic is the source of the presented data, which were collected and analyzed retrospectively. We conducted a descriptive analysis. The ages of the hospitalized patients ranged from 17 days to 82 years, 55 (56.12%) were adults, and 43 (43.88%) were children; among the adults, there were 29 (29.59%) men and 26 (26.53%) women, while among the children there were 25 (25.51%) boys and 18 (18.37%) girls. The most common causes of hospitalization after an animal bite were infectious diseases (cat-scratch disease, rat-bite fever) and severity of wounds, which is comparable to the data available from other countries. There is no statistically significant difference in the frequency of hospitalization between children and adults, while dogs are statistically significantly more likely to inflict injuries that result in hospitalization than other animals. However, no specific anatomical location exhibited a statistically significant higher frequency of bites compared to others, as one might expect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.