Observational studyActa clinica Croatica2024
RAPID ANTIGEN TESTING FOR COVID-19 SHOULD BE AVOIDED AS SCREENING TEST AT LARGE SPORTING EVENTS WITH CLOSE PHYSICAL CONTACT BETWEEN COMPETITORS.
Observational study in Acta clinica Croatica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large sporting events during the pandemic are organized as 'COVID-19 free zones', function under quarantine measures, and are regularly testing all participants. Recently, point-of-care tests (POCT) for rapid detection of COVID-19 antigen were presented as a cheaper, faster, and easier-to-perform option than reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. However, no study confirmed the efficacy of POCT used at a large sporting event that includes close physical contact, such as judo. An observational study was conducted that included 670 participants from 36 countries attending two consecutive judo competitions. In total, 839 RT-PCR tests and 839 POCT tests for COVID-19 were performed. There were 508 participants tested at one time point when entering the venue, while 162 were tested at two time points in order to participate in both competitions. Seven subjects had positive RT-PCR results, while 4 had positive POCT results, meaning the prevalence of COVID-19 at the competitions was 1.04% according to the RT-PCR results. The main finding of this study was that POCT testing proved to be an effective method in detecting true-negative results. However, due to sensitivity that is insufficient to detect all true-positive cases, POCT should always be used in combination with RT-PCR at large sporting events with close physical contact between competitors in order to avoid COVID-19 outbreak.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.