Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050153›Full record

ArticlePhysical review. X

Electric Field of DNA in Solution: Who Is in Charge?

Jonathan G Hedley, Kush Coshic, Aleksei Aksimentiev, Alexei A Kornyshev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review. X. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Direct evidence and quantification of homologous recognition between DNA duplexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Electrostatics and viscosity are strongly linked in concentrated antibody solutions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan G HedleyDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, 82 Wood Lane, London W12 0BZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5513-4098
Kush CoshicCenter for Biophysics and Quantitative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7179-4624
Aleksei AksimentievDepartment of Physics and Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6042-8442
Alexei A KornyshevDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, 82 Wood Lane, London W12 0BZ, United Kingdom and Thomas Young Centre for Theory and Simulation of Materials, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3157-8791

Funding

Multi-resolution Approaches to Modeling the 3D Structure, Delivery, and Replication of Viral GenomesR01GM137015 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI AKSIMENTIEV, ALEKSEI · 2020 to 2023
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM137015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In solution, DNA, the "most important molecule of life," is a highly charged macromolecule that bears a unit of negative charge on each phosphate of its sugar-phosphate backbone. Although partially compensated by counterions (cations of the solution) adsorbed at or condensed near it, DNA still produces a substantial electric field in its vicinity, which is screened by buffer electrolytes at longer distances from the DNA. This electric field is experienced by any charged or dipolar species approaching and interacting with the DNA. So far, such a field has been explored predominantly within the scope of a primitive model of the electrolytic solution, not considering more complicated structural effects of the water solvent. In this paper, we investigate the distribution of electric field around DNA using linear response nonlocal electrostatic theory, applied here for helix-specific charge distributions, and compare the predictions of such a theory with specially performed, fully atomistic, large-scale, molecular dynamics simulations. Both approaches are applied to unravel the role of the structure of water at close distances to and within the grooves of a DNA molecule in the formation of the electric field. As predicted by the theory and reported by the simulations, the main finding of this study is that oscillations in the electrostatic potential distribution are present around DNA, caused by the overscreening effect of structured water. Surprisingly, electrolyte ions at physiological concentrations do not strongly disrupt these oscillations and are rather distributed according to these oscillating patterns, indicating that water structural effects dominate the short-range electrostatics. We also show that (i) structured water adsorbed in the grooves of DNA leads to a positive electrostatic potential core relative to the bulk, (ii) the Debye length some 10 Å away from the DNA surface is reduced, effectively renormalized by the helical pitch of the DNA molecule, and (iii) Lorentzian contributions to the nonlocal dielectric function of water, effectively reducing the dielectric constant close to the DNA surface, enhance the overall electric field. The impressive agreement between the atomistic simulations and the developed theory substantiates the use of nonlocal electrostatics when considering solvent effects in molecular processes in biology.

Indexed as

Biological PhysicsChemical PhysicsSoft Matter

Identifiers

PMID41050153
PMCPMC12489989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.