Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050126›Full record

ReviewKidney medicine2025

Patient and Stakeholder Collaborative Research: Development of a Community Advisory Board for Nephrology and Transplantation Studies.

Nidhi Ghildayal, Jennifer Scherer, Akanksha Nalatwad, Ilana Mittleman, Jennifer Jones, Valen Keefer, Smiti Nadkarni, Matthew Palmer, Macey L Levan, Rasheeda Hall and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nidhi GhildayalDepartment of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Jennifer SchererDepartment of Internal Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Akanksha NalatwadDepartment of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Ilana MittlemanDepartment of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Jennifer JonesNew York University Kidney Disease and Health Community Advisory Board, New York, NY.
Valen KeeferNew York University Kidney Disease and Health Community Advisory Board, New York, NY.
Smiti NadkarniNew York University Kidney Disease and Health Community Advisory Board, New York, NY.
Matthew PalmerNew York University Kidney Disease and Health Community Advisory Board, New York, NY.
Macey L LevanDepartment of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Rasheeda HallDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Dorry L SegevDepartment of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Mara McAdams-DeMarcoDepartment of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community input enhances the impact of research. Yet, there are challenges when eliciting community perspectives in nephrology/transplant research: recruitment of patients across a wide spectrum of familiarity with kidney disease; a lack of trust from marginalized patients because of health care barriers, institutionalized structural racism, and historical harm; and retention of members facing high burden of care. To address these challenges, we drafted a mission and formed a community advisory board to provide input on nephrology/transplant research. We worked with kidney disease community organizations that prioritize diversity and equity to recruit members with chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease, or a kidney transplant, as well as nephrology/transplant caregivers and kidney donors. We formed a diverse group of 9 members and received feedback on 5 research proposals over 4 quarterly meetings, bridging a communication gap between community perspectives and researchers. The collaborative environment stimulated feedback that improved our nephrology/transplant research to reflect the perspectives of those most affected by research findings. Eight members have remained active for more than 1 year. In this collaborative paper, we describe our process of forming a nephrology/transplant community advisory board, and participants highlight the benefits of sharing their lived experiences to improve and amplify the impact of nephrology/transplant research.

Indexed as

Community advisory boardcommunity engagementhealth equitykidney diseasekidney transplant

Identifiers

PMID41050126
PMCPMC12495462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.