ArticleKidney medicine2025
Optimizing a Dose Prescription as the First Step of Green Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy.
Article in Kidney medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A position statement and recommendations for sustainable kidney care.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale & Objective: Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) requires a large amount of fluid; however, it is often overused in clinical settings, leading to fluid waste. This study aimed to investigate the influence of dose optimization on fluid consumption and dialysis efficacy. Study Design: Single-center prospective study. Setting & Participants: All patients treated with CKRT at Pusan National University Hospital between May 1 and December 31, 2023. Quality Improvement Activities: The CKRT prescription dose was adjusted from the previous 35-25-30 mL/kg/h, targeting delivered doses between 20 and 25 mL/kg/h, as per the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes recommendations. Outcomes: The primary outcome was the change in total fluid consumption, and the secondary outcome was the differences in the pattern of biochemical parameter changes after 48 hours of CKRT before and after the study (serum urea nitrogen, creatinine, potassium, phosphate, and bicarbonate). Analytic Approach: General linear model for the primary outcome; repeated measures analysis of variance for the secondary outcome. Results: A total of 441 patients were included before (N = 210) and after (N = 231) participating in the study. The median age was 70.0 (61.0-77.5) years; 67.3% were male, and 17.6% had end-stage kidney disease. Before the study, the median prescribed dose for CKRT was 34.1 (33.0-35.4) mL/kg/h, with the median amount of fluid consumption being 53.6 (43.0-63.2) L/person/d. During the study periods, the median delivered dose was reduced to 27.4 mL/kg/h ( Limitations: The fluid-saving effect may be greater in countries with heavier patients. Conclusions: Efforts to optimize CKRT dosing allowed for a 12.7% reduction in fluid consumption (ie, 6.7 L/person/d), without any additional changes in treatment efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.