Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050104›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Predicting BRICS NIFTY50 returns using XAI and S.A.F.E AI lens.

Indranil Ghosh, Tamal Datta Chaudhuri, Golnoosh Babaei, Paolo Giudici, Emanuela Raffinetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Indranil GhoshIT & Analytics Area, Institute of Management Technology Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Tamal Datta ChaudhuriBengal Economic Association, Kolkata, India.
Golnoosh BabaeiDepartment of Economics and Management, Universita di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Paolo GiudiciDepartment of Economics and Management, Universita di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Emanuela RaffinettiDepartment of Economics and Management, Universita di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Global fund managers, in their effort toward risk diversification and generating higher returns, design portfolios that consist of financial assets of various countries. In the process, they expose their investors not only to the fundamentals of the assets but also to transnational volatility, macroeconomic shocks of different countries, and exchange rate fluctuations. These factors make forecasting returns from such global funds quite difficult and, at the same time, challenging. To aid global fund managers and investors, this study presents a forecasting framework for predicting returns from Goldman Sachs BRICs Nifty 50 Developed Markets Index (BRICS NIFTY 50), which is a traded and listed financial asset. It is a global portfolio, which not only exposes investors to the fundamentals of different companies but also to country risk. Design methodology and approach: Gradient boosting regression (GBR) and SHAP-based XAI are used to identify the top significant country-specific explanatory variables. Subsequently, with the selected variables, GBR, CatBoost, Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), and Extra Tree Regressor (ETR) are applied for forecasting returns from BRICS NIFTY 50. Along with standard evaluation tools, the S.A.F.E AI framework is used for measuring predictive accuracy, sustainability, and contribution of each predictor. To evaluate the relative efficacy of the six predictive models, the underlying research resorts to a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework. Findings: We find that country-specific market volatility, industrial performance, financial sector development, and exchange rate fluctuations explain global returns significantly. Furthermore, the exercise also reveals that explanatory factors specific to India, China, and Brazil emerge to be relatively important. Research limitations and implications: The study focuses on a single index. Future work will extend it to other indices and global funds. Practical implications: The proposed methodology will be of practical use to global fund managers and investors. Policymakers may find it useful for identifying factors that make foreign direct investment and portfolio investment attractive. Originality and value: Development of a two-step forecasting framework, identifying effects of country-specific explanatory variables, and applying different evaluation criteria to measure predictive efficiency underscore the novelty of the work.

Indexed as

BRICSglobal fundsS.A.F.E AISHAP-based XAItransnational volatility

Identifiers

PMID41050104
PMCPMC12488714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.