ReviewOncology research2025
Topical Chemotherapy for Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia: A Review of Adverse Effects and Their Clinical Management.
Review in Oncology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utility of ultrasound biomicroscopy in detecting invasive ocular surface squamous neoplasia.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- New Paradigm in Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia-Insights from a Case Report on the Use of Interferon in Treatment.Oncology research · 2026Article
- Establishment of a nomogram model to predict malignant risk in patients with ocular surface squamous neoplasia and ocular surface squamous epithelial tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Topical chemotherapy is increasingly used to treat ocular surface tumors as a primary therapy and an adjuvant treatment after surgical excision. The most employed topical agents include mitomycin C (MMC), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and interferon alpha-2b (IFNα2b), each with distinct mechanisms of action, efficacy profiles, and toxicity risks. Although these agents offer effective tumor control and allow for a non-invasive approach in many cases, ocular surface complications requiring medical or surgical management can occur. This summarizes the adverse effect and outilines practical strategies for their prevention and treatment. MMC is the most potent agent but also the most toxic, with reported complications such as limbal stem cell deficiency, punctal stenosis, and persistent epithelial defects. 5-FU demonstrates a more favorable safety profile, although rare cases of corneal ulceration have been described. IFNα2b is well tolerated and associated primarily with mild, reversible reactions. The choice of the proper agent should be tailored according to patient's clinical presentation, ocular surface status, and ability to adhere to therapy and follow-up. Timely recognition and management of complications are essential to minimize long-term sequelae. Reliance on compounded formulations highlights the need for stable, standardized, and commercially available topical agents specifically designed for ocular use to ensure safety, reproducibility, and global accessibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.