Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050040›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

From Margins to Mainstream: Making Psychological Interventions for the Treatment of Obesity and Weight Management Core to NHS Primary Care.

Hasan Basri, Marwah Al-Waadh, Zeid Mohammed

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hasan BasriGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, Bishops Close Medical Practice, Durham, GBR.
Marwah Al-WaadhGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, Norton Medical Centre, Stockton-on-Tees, GBR.
Zeid MohammedPsychiatry, Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (CNTW), Newcastle, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity continues to place an escalating burden on the NHS, both economically and socially. Despite the introduction of a tiered model of care, psychological support within Tier 2 services remains patchy and is often delivered by non-specialists, thereby limiting its effectiveness. This editorial argues that meaningful progress requires a stronger integration of evidence-based psychological interventions, such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, Motivational Interviewing, and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, into routine primary care. Current provision is highly variable, with many patients facing long waits for higher-tier services and little access to structured mental health input at the community level. Digital tools show promise, but adoption remains inconsistent and inequitable. Primary care is uniquely positioned to address these shortcomings: upskilling GPs and allied staff, embedding psychologists within Primary Care Networks, and scaling digital support could provide earlier, more equitable intervention while reducing the burden on secondary care. If obesity is to be managed effectively and sustainably, Tier 2 services must evolve from their current fragmented state into a model where psychological care is recognised as central, not peripheral, to treatment.

Indexed as

national health service (nhs)obesityprimary health carepsychology therapyweight loss and obesity

Identifiers

PMID41050040
PMCPMC12494502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.