Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41050024›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Mandible Thickness in the Pediatric Population: A Pilot Normative Anthropometric Estimation Using CT Images.

Anuvindha Js, Prudhvinath Reddy, Shikha Yadav, Rajeev Aravindakshan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anuvindha JsDepartment of Dentistry (Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Mangalagiri, Mangalagiri, IND.
Prudhvinath ReddyDepartment of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Mangalagiri, Mangalagiri, IND.
Shikha YadavDepartment of Dentistry (Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Mangalagiri, Mangalagiri, IND.
Rajeev AravindakshanDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Mangalagiri, Mangalagiri, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The mandible's morphology in Indian pediatric patients, shaped by genetic, environmental, and functional factors, is critical for diagnosing anomalies and planning surgical interventions, especially implant placement. However, there is scarce morphometric data on mandibular bone thickness in Indian children, coupled with the reliance on adult-focused studies and outdated imaging, which underscores the need for precise evaluation. This study aimed to address these gaps related to the topic Methodology We sought to assess normative anthropometric data from CT scans of 29 patients aged 2-16 years, sourced from a tertiary care hospital's database. Using a retrospective approach, the mandible was classified into anterior and posterior segments, with full and cortical thicknesses measured at nine key points. Results Our findings revealed no significant bilateral differences. Maximum full and cortical thicknesses were observed at point 7 (upper one-third, distal-most body region). At the same time, minimum values were at point 3 (lower one-third, symphysis-parasymphysis) for full thickness and point 1 (upper one-third, symphysis-parasymphysis) for cortical thickness.  Conclusions This study provides normative mandibular thickness data for Indian children, offering a foundation for global mandibular assessment across ages and genders, thereby enhancing the safety and efficacy of dental and surgical interventions.

Indexed as

anthropometricchildrenjawmandiblepaediatric

Identifiers

PMID41050024
PMCPMC12491600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.