ArticleCureus2025
Comparative Analysis of Facial Injuries From Electric and Gas Stoves: A National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) Database Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Injury from household stoves can be a significant public health issue, with the potential to cause severe harm from both electric and gas stoves. This study aims to compare the prevalence and types of facial injuries with other types of body injuries, as well as age-and gender-related injuries, resulting from electric and gas stoves, using data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database. Data from NEISS showed that gas stove incidents resulted in 102 facial injuries, accounting for 46.2% of all gas stove-related injuries by body part. In contrast, electric stoves were associated with 349 hand-related injuries, comprising 60.6% of all electric stove-related injuries. Further analysis revealed that children up to five years old are disproportionately injured by stoves, totaling 315 cases, which represents more than six-fold the number reported in the six to 10-year age group (n=47). It was found that boys experienced a peak in stove-related burns in 2020, likely attributed to the American lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The remaining burn injuries remained relatively stable over the 10 years. The higher incidence of gas stove-related facial injuries can be explained by the long-range burning effect of flames produced by gas stoves. Meanwhile, the hand-related injuries from electric stoves can be attributed to the curiosity of young children using their hands to explore their environment. The findings indicate that implementing advanced stove-safety features, along with proactive measures by households and healthcare providers, can substantially reduce stove-related injuries and foster a safer living environment for all members of the household.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.