ArticleCureus2025
Chronic Ectopic Pregnancy: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Case of a Chronic Ectopic Pregnancy in a Patient With Negative Serum β-HCG.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic ectopic pregnancy (CEP) is an under-recognised variant of ectopic pregnancy, characterised by low or absent serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), a complex adnexal mass, and non-specific clinical symptoms and signs. We present a case of a woman in her 30s with progressive lower abdominal pain, an equivocal pregnancy test, and spontaneous vaginal bleeding. Transvaginal ultrasound demonstrated an inhomogeneous, avascular right adnexal mass on ultrasound, with associated haemoperitoneum. A diagnostic laparoscopy revealed a haemorrhagic ampullary mass and 300 mL of intraperitoneal blood. The right fallopian tube was excised, and histopathological examination confirmed CEP. This case highlights the complexity of obtaining a diagnosis of CEP, particularly when symptoms and investigations may mimic other pelvic pathologies. Laparoscopic salpingectomy remains the mainstay of treatment as it eliminates the risk of any persistent trophoblastic tissue. CEP should remain a differential diagnosis in any patient of reproductive age with pelvic pain or abnormal bleeding, irrespective of β-hCG levels, to avoid premature discharge and reduce delays in definitive management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.