ArticleCureus2025
Just-in-Time: Statewide Preceptor Development Through Brief Asynchronous Modules.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment in competency-based medical education for anesthesiology: validity evidence, equity, and faculty readiness.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Clinical teachers are vital to the quality of the trainee learning environment. However, many of them undertake teaching roles without formal training. Time constraints and geographic distance of preceptors from central academic campuses may be barriers to such training. The University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine (SOM)'s Academy of Educators (AOE) aimed to address these gaps through the development of AOE Essentials online training modules. Methods AOE Essentials consists of three asynchronous, self-paced modules designed for clinical preceptors across six clinical sites in North Carolina. A diverse group of 22 faculty members developed the modules, which cover topics such as setting expectations, completing evaluations, and providing effective feedback. Each module includes embedded videos, diagnostic quizzes, and pre- and post-tests of satisfaction and knowledge gain for assessment. Knowledge gain in each module is assessed by four to five multiple-choice, one-best-answer questions for each quiz that were initially designed by each module's faculty and subsequently reviewed by study authors with expertise in medical education scholarship generally and survey methodology specifically. Three separate questions assessing the quality/quantity of information and clarity of visual information were adapted from the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). Results To date, 254 modules have been completed by faculty. The Expectations module (n = 104) was completed at higher rates than Evaluations (n = 71) or Feedback (n = 79) models. Analysis revealed significant improvements in pre-post knowledge scores for the Expectations (p<0.001) and Evaluation (p<0.001) modules. The Feedback module showed no significant change (p = 0.398), though this may have been limited by the ceiling effect and potential prior knowledge in this area. Participant feedback indicated high satisfaction, with average ratings ranging from 4.47 to 4.7 for content relevance and clarity. Additionally, 97% of participants would recommend the modules to colleagues. Conclusions AOE Essentials represents a novel asynchronous, multi-site faculty development program specifically designed for geographically dispersed clinical preceptors, demonstrating measurable knowledge gains and high participant satisfaction. Limitations of this study include completion of the evaluation immediately after completion of the modules, thus only assessing immediate knowledge gains, as well as concerns about a possible ceiling effect for some participants, limiting the ability to determine knowledge acquisition during the module. Future initiatives will explore knowledge retention of participants at three to six months, creation of additional training modules, and the potential for mandatory training for preceptors. Despite its limitations, this program may serve as a template for other institutions facing similar challenges in faculty development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.