ReviewCureus2025
The Future of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in General Surgery: Integrating Artificial Intelligence, Personalized Care, and Technological Advances.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond robotic platforms: artificial intelligence and the emergence of intelligent surgical ecosystems in colorectal surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Challenges for implementation of "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery" (ERAS) protocols and artificial intelligence support tools in resource-limited countries.Patient safety in surgery · 2026Article
- Review
- Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols on post-operative outcomes in elective abdominal surgeries: A prospective study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery as Patient Safety Strategies for Perioperative Care in Resource-Limited Settings.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have changed and improved surgical care and practice, transforming classic approaches toward more evidence-based practices. ERAS protocols demonstrate consistent benefits, including reduced hospital length of stay, decreased postoperative complications, and significant cost savings. Advances include the development and integration of AI and digital health technologies that promise to personalize and optimize recovery pathways. However, the global application of ERAS may face great challenges, starting with resource limitations, resistance to change, and variable compliance rates. This review discusses and highlights the application of ERAS, identifies barriers to implementation, and proposes evidence-based recommendations for optimizing ERAS adoption and sustainability in modern surgical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.