Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049955›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Student Preferences for Feedback Delivery in Healthcare Education: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Pei Nee Wong, Pei Se Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pei Nee WongPharmacy Department, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, ARE.
Pei Se WongPharmacy Department, IMU University, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFeedback plays a vital role in student learning by identifying areas for improvement and promoting academic growth. The effectiveness of feedback depends on its form and when it is delivered. The literature has shown that students express a desire for more systematic and timely feedback and diverse strategies for feedback delivery. However, little is known about healthcare profession students' preferred feedback styles in different learning activities. PURPOSE: The study aims to investigate the preferred feedback styles of pharmacy and nursing students in Fatima College of Health Sciences (FCHS), a healthcare education institution in the United Arab Emirates.

methodsA web-based survey was sent to pharmacy and nursing students on two campuses. The survey assessed preferred feedback methods in six areas: preparedness, performance, and attitude during a clinical activity, technical procedures, and inpatient and outpatient care. Respondents chose their preferred feedback method for each area.

resultsA total of 196 students completed the survey. Uniquely, the findings showed that the majority of students valued feedback on preparation, performance, attitude, and patient care most when it was given privately after the activity, whereas feedback on technical procedures was better received when delivered immediately and openly during the activity.

conclusionThe findings revealed the need to tailor feedback approaches to both task type and learner expectations. These insights can be leveraged to enhance teaching practice and guide faculty training, thereby strengthening feedback practices in healthcare professions education.

Indexed as

clinical educationeducational assessmentfeedback preferenceshealth professions educationstudent learning

Identifiers

PMID41049955
PMCPMC12489016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.