ReviewCureus2025
Epilepsy-Related Misconceptions, Cultural Beliefs, and Their Impact on Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Caregiver burden and associated factors among primary caregivers of children with epilepsy in southwestern Uganda.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2026Article
- Epilepsy Knowledge, Attitudes, and First-Aid Practices Among Syrian University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Intranasal Biodegradable Nanomedicine for Epilepsy Management: Targeting the Brain Beyond the Blood-Brain Barrier.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Exploring the use of art interventions in challenging stigmas related to neurological disorders: A scoping review.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epilepsy is still a highly stigmatized neurological condition globally, and health outcomes in patients are greatly impacted by cultural misunderstandings. Treatment delays, poor adherence, and social isolation can result from misconceptions that attribute epilepsy to supernatural origins, contagion, or genetic factors. This is especially true in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In light of this, we conducted this systematic review to analyze various aspects related to the topic. Out of 499 publications that were retrieved using Semantic Scholar, 40 research articles from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas were examined. Cultural attitudes, stigma, and epilepsy health outcomes were the main topics of the inclusion criteria. To assess misunderstandings, social consequences, healthcare-seeking behaviors, and the efficacy of interventions, data were thematically synthesized. In 66-72% of the groups examined, supernatural beliefs (such as witchcraft and curses) were common, which resulted in a preference for traditional healers and a delay in receiving care. Stigma took the form of prejudice in marriage, job (72% exclusion from the workplace), and education (66% opposed education for individuals with epilepsy in Rwanda). In LMICs, interventions such as culturally sensitive treatment and community education increased adherence but were not scalable. Cultural misconceptions perpetuate epilepsy-related stigma and poor health outcomes. Effective strategies require integrated approaches combining biomedical care with community-based education and policy reforms. Future research should prioritize scalable, culturally adapted interventions to reduce the global epilepsy "treatment gaps."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.