ArticleCureus2025
Invasive Airway Breathing Circulation Disability: A Comprehensive Course for Emergency Physicians.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The invasive airway, breathing, circulation, and disability workshop was aimed at enhancing the competency of emergency physicians in life-saving procedures, crucial in the emergency room during resuscitation. Objectives The primary objective was to assess the improvement in the participants' knowledge before and after the workshop. The secondary objective was to assess the confidence level of the participants based on their feedback. Method A pre-test and post-test were conducted for the participants. Initial didactic lectures followed by hands-on skills practice were carried out. The participants were allocated into eight groups. Each group had to rotate every half an hour so that each participant could get adequate time for practice on the cadaver or manikin. A faculty/facilitator expert in the respective field supervised each skill station. Structured feedback was obtained from the participants after the workshop. Results Thirty-seven participants attended the workshop. The median pre-test score was 8 (IQR 6-9), and the post-test score was 13 (IQR 12-14). There was a significant increase in the knowledge level of the participants (p <0.001). The participants' confidence in performing fibreoptic intubation, cricothyroidotomy, pericardiocentesis, chest tube insertion, central line, and external ventricular drain was increased significantly (p<0.001). Conclusion This teaching and training program on invasive procedural skills has increased the knowledge and confidence of the participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.