ReviewCureus2025
TIAS (Timing, Individualised, Amalgamated, Stepwise) Algorithm for Efficacious and Cost-Effective Cardiac Monitoring to Detect Atrial Fibrillation After Stroke.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a significant contributor to cardioembolic stroke and often remains undiagnosed in cryptogenic or embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS). Extended cardiac monitoring has become a crucial strategy for enhancing post-stroke AF detection. Landmark trials such as EMBRACE, ASSERT, and CRYSTAL-AF have demonstrated higher AF detection rates with longer or implantable devices compared to standard short-term electrocardiograms (ECGs). This narrative review examines selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs), extensive prospective studies, meta-analyses, and guideline statements, while excluding case reports, small single-centre studies, and reports without AF detection endpoints on extended cardiac monitoring. It provides a detailed comparison of different monitoring strategies alongside their relative cost-effectiveness. It primarily assesses cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), direct healthcare expenditure, and, where available, indirect costs such as readmissions, complications, accessibility, and benefits. The review also introduces the innovative "TIAS" strategy for cardiac monitoring following stroke, which stands for Timing, Individualised, Amalgamated, and Stepwise approach. It aims to assist clinicians in developing an evidence-based, cost-effective plan for cardiac monitoring. By employing customised monitoring strategies that account for each patient's risk factors, stroke subtype, and healthcare setting, the TIAS approach aims to improve AF diagnosis and reduce the likelihood of stroke recurrence, while acknowledging limitations such as heterogeneity across trials, uncertainty about AF burden thresholds, and challenges in real-world implementation across variable healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.