ArticleCureus2025
Adequacy of Lateral Ankle Radiograph Views in Acute Trauma Setting: A Quality Improvement Project.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAccurate radiographic assessment is critical in the management of ankle trauma, where lateral ankle views play a key role in identifying fractures and assessing joint alignment. Inadequate radiographs can lead to diagnostic delays or mismanagement. This quality improvement project aimed to evaluate and improve the adequacy of lateral ankle radiographs in a trauma setting, in line with British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST) guidelines.
methodsA retrospective closed-loop audit was conducted in a UK trauma unit. One hundred lateral ankle radiographs were evaluated in the first cycle based on four criteria for a "true lateral" view: (1) distal fibula superimposed by posterior tibia; (2) talar domes superimposed; (3) open and uniform tibiotalar joint space; and (4) inclusion of anatomical landmarks (lower third of tibia and fibula, talus, calcaneus, and base of the fifth metatarsal). Following the first cycle, targeted interventions, educational sessions, and visual reference posters were implemented. A second cycle of 100 radiographs was then assessed using the same criteria. Statistical comparison between the two cycles was performed using the chi-squared test.
resultsIn the first cycle, compliance rates were 83% (criterion one), 61% (criterion two), 69% (criterion three), and 99% (criterion four). After the intervention, the second cycle showed improvements across criteria one to three, with compliance rates of 95%, 85%, and 92%, respectively. Criterion four remained unchanged at 99%. The chi-squared analysis demonstrated statistically significant improvements for criteria one (p=0.0129), two (p=0.0002), and three (p=0.0001), but not for criterion four (p=1.0).
conclusionThis audit demonstrated that simple, cost-effective educational interventions significantly improved the adequacy of lateral ankle radiographs in a trauma setting. Sustained improvement requires continued reinforcement of radiographic standards, multidisciplinary collaboration, and routine audit cycles to ensure consistent image quality in acute care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.