Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049914›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Artificial Intelligence in Prehospital Emergency Care: Advancing Triage and Destination Decisions for Time-Critical Conditions.

Rayan Zarei, Martin C Downs, Leslie Torgerson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rayan ZareiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, USA.
Martin C DownsDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, USA.
Leslie TorgersonDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prehospital triage is critical for time-sensitive emergencies such as trauma, stroke, and acute coronary syndrome. Undertriage delays definitive care, while overtriage strains higher-level facilities. Existing triage tools based on vital signs and scoring systems have limited accuracy, but artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and neural networks (NN) offer the potential to improve decision-making by integrating multiple data sources. This narrative review of studies indexed in PubMed and PubMed Central through August 2025 evaluated AI, ML, and NN models designed for prehospital triage or transport destination decisions across trauma, critical illness, stroke, dyspnea, cardiac emergencies, sepsis, and in-hospital studies preventing possible readmission. Across the conditions examined, ML models consistently outperformed traditional early warning scores and guideline-based tools. Trauma models achieved area under the curve (AUC) values between 0.75 and 0.93 and reduced undertriage to less than 10%. ML models predicted the need for critical care with an AUC of 0.908, and prehospital stroke algorithms reached AUCs above 0.98. NN, deep forest, and random forest models demonstrated an AUC of 0.88 in prehospital acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) prediction. Additional studies demonstrated improved recognition of dyspnea-related serious events and acute coronary syndrome, while no validated models currently exist for prehospital sepsis. Despite promising results, most studies were retrospective, with limited prospective validation, generalizability, or evaluation of workflow integration. Future research should focus on prospective studies, diverse patient cohorts, integration into emergency medical service (EMS) workflows, model explainability, and rigorous comparisons with standard practice.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromeartificial intelligenceemergency medical servicesmachine learningprehospital triagerespiratory distresssepsisstroketime-critical conditionstrauma

Identifiers

PMID41049914
PMCPMC12494111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.